| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Celeron G3900TE


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 32.6 k points while the G3900TE gets 31.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
506e3
Core
Broadwell-U
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2015
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
49.34k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5200U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2.67k
2.36k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
9.37k
9.79k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
3.08k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
3.36k (x1.3)
TOTAL
17.76k
18.59k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-5200U

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
4.45k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
19.01k
18.16k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.48k
5.48k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
3.5k (x1.18)
TOTAL
32.61k
31.59k (x0.97)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
277 points/W
127 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1268 points/W
519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
432 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
2174 points/W
903 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
988 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3469 points/GHz
4259 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1160 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
961 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
6577 points/GHz
8084 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4