| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Ryzen 5 4600H


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 4.9 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
860f01
Core
Broadwell-U
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2 /4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
334.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
15.48k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
22.82k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
8.63k (x2.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
7.17k (x2.46)
TOTAL
31.81k
54.11k (x1.7)

Multithread

i5-5200U

4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
117.98k (x4.08)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
146.43k (x5.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
65.54k (x8.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
4.77k (x1.28)
TOTAL
68.69k
334.72k (x4.87)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
7438 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4