Core i5-5200U vs Ryzen 5 3500X
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 5.4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 5.4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
870f10
Core
Broadwell-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
373.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
15.48k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
22.91k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
7.1k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
21.11k (x7.24)
TOTAL
31.81k
66.61k (x2.09)
Multithread
i5-5200U
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
90.39k (x3.13)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
139.1k (x4.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
53.2k (x7.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
90.92k (x24.31)
TOTAL
68.69k
373.61k (x5.44)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
5748 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4