| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Ryzen 5 2600X


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600X is 4.8 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
800f82
Core
Broadwell-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
333.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
15.75k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
26.29k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
5.91k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
18.48k (x6.34)
TOTAL
31.81k
66.44k (x2.09)

Multithread

i5-5200U

2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
94.49k (x3.27)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
182.53k (x6.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
45.95k (x6.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
10.15k (x2.71)
TOTAL
68.69k
333.12k (x4.85)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
3507 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4