Core i5-5200U vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
810f81
Core
Broadwell-U
Dali
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
9.33k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
17.1k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
3.57k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
3.26k (x1.12)
TOTAL
31.81k
33.26k (x1.05)
Multithread
i5-5200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
22.14k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
40.04k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
10.71k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
5k (x1.34)
TOTAL
68.69k
77.88k (x1.13)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4