| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Athlon 3000G


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
810f81
Core
Broadwell-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
95.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
13.02k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
20.56k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
4.81k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
5.43k (x1.86)
TOTAL
31.81k
43.82k (x1.38)

Multithread

i5-5200U

3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
27.29k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
49.37k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
13.57k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
5.61k (x1.5)
TOTAL
68.69k
95.84k (x1.4)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
2738 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4