Core i5-5200U vs Athlon X4 950
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
660f51
Core
Broadwell-U
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
12.44k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
15.96k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
3.54k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
3k (x1.03)
TOTAL
31.81k
34.93k (x1.1)
Multithread
i5-5200U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
40.75k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
42.07k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
12.53k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
4.45k (x1.19)
TOTAL
68.69k
99.8k (x1.45)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4