Core i5-5200U vs A6 9210
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
670f00
Core
Broadwell-U
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
27.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5200U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
8.48k
4.71k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
12.03k
11.03k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
2.59k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.45k (x0.88)
TOTAL
26.62k
20.78k (x0.78)
Multithread
i5-5200U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
15.19k
8.43k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
25.99k
12.8k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
3.32k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
2.59k (x0.87)
TOTAL
50.85k
27.13k (x0.53)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1013 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1733 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
3390 points/W
1809 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3140 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
9860 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4