| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs i7-11700F


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 7.5 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
a0671
Core
Broadwell-U
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2 /4
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
32.55k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
26.95k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
10.76k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
19.32k (x6.62)
TOTAL
31.81k
89.58k (x2.82)

Multithread

i5-5200U

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
232.06k (x8.03)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
203.56k (x7.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
72.89k (x9.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.81k (x1.02)
TOTAL
68.69k
512.32k (x7.46)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4