| | | | | | |

Core i5-4690K vs i5-10300H


Description
The i5-4690K is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690K gets a score of 117.4 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4690K is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0652
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
88 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.37k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4690K
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.71k
15.65k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
12.53k
23.13k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.66k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
11.43k (x3.63)
TOTAL
34.37k
55.87k (x1.63)

Multithread

i5-4690K

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.91k
26.77k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
45.46k
43.81k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.55k
10.17k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.44k
11.91k (x4.87)
TOTAL
117.37k
92.66k (x0.79)

Performance/W
i5-4690K
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
579 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
517 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
28 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
1334 points/W
2059 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4690K
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3515 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3213 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
807 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
8812 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4