Core i5-4690K vs Ryzen 5 3550H
Description
The i5-4690K is based on Haswell architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690K gets a score of 43.8 k points while the 3550H gets 108.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 2.5 times faster than the i5-4690K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690K gets a score of 43.8 k points while the 3550H gets 108.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 2.5 times faster than the i5-4690K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
88 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.37k points
178.26k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4690K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
3.63k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
10.93k
16.69k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
4.92k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
5k (x1.22)
TOTAL
24.26k
30.24k (x1.25)
Multithread
i5-4690K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.67k
13.62k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
21.42k
65.71k (x3.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.52k
23.7k (x2.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
5.64k (x1.35)
TOTAL
43.79k
108.67k (x2.48)
Performance/W
i5-4690K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
98 points/W
389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
243 points/W
1877 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
3105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4690K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
1126 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2804 points/GHz
4512 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1236 points/GHz
1329 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1053 points/GHz
1352 points/GHz
TOTAL
6220 points/GHz
8174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4