| | | | | | |

Core i5-4690 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i5-4690 is based on Haswell architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690 gets a score of 163.9 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
50654
Core
Haswell
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
84 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2014
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
45.95k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.95k points
281.48k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4690
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
18.78k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
13.02k
16.25k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
3.99k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.74k
6.8k (x1.43)
TOTAL
45.95k
45.82k (x1)

Multithread

i5-4690

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
85.98k
133.55k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
49.01k
108.43k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.5k
30.02k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.46k
9.48k (x1)
TOTAL
163.95k
281.48k (x1.72)

Performance/W
i5-4690
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1024 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
583 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
1952 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4690
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5889 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3339 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1216 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
11781 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4