Core i5-4690 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i5-4690 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690 gets a score of 163.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690 gets a score of 163.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
84 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2014
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
45.95k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.95k points
237.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4690
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
12.16k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
13.02k
11.82k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
3.02k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.74k
2.4k (x0.51)
TOTAL
45.95k
29.39k (x0.64)
Multithread
i5-4690
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
85.98k
103.77k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
49.01k
102.28k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.5k
26.13k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.46k
5.65k (x0.6)
TOTAL
163.95k
237.83k (x1.45)
Performance/W
i5-4690
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1024 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
583 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
1952 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4690
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5889 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3339 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1216 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
11781 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4