| | | | | | |

Core i5-4690 vs i7-10870H


Description
The i5-4690 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690 gets a score of 163.9 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 3 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0652
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
84 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
June 2014
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.95k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.95k points
487.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4690
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
30.38k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
13.02k
27.95k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
6.51k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.74k
14.37k (x3.03)
TOTAL
45.95k
79.2k (x1.72)

Multithread

i5-4690

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
85.98k
216.18k (x2.51)
Test#2 (FP)
49.01k
210.82k (x4.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.5k
51.57k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.46k
8.47k (x0.89)
TOTAL
163.95k
487.05k (x2.97)

Performance/W
i5-4690
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
1024 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
583 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
1952 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4690
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
5889 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3339 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1216 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
11781 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4