| | | | | | |

Core i5-4690 vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The i5-4690 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690 gets a score of 163.9 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 2.1 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a50f00
Core
Haswell
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
June 2014
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
45.95k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.95k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4690
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
22.16k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
13.02k
24.46k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
10.71k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.74k
22.44k (x4.73)
TOTAL
45.95k
79.76k (x1.74)

Multithread

i5-4690

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
85.98k
112.5k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
49.01k
153.92k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.5k
67.75k (x3.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.46k
11.47k (x1.21)
TOTAL
163.95k
345.64k (x2.11)

Performance/W
i5-4690
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
1024 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
583 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
1952 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4690
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
5889 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3339 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1216 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
11781 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4