| | | | | | |

Core i5-4690 vs Ryzen 3 2200G


Description
The i5-4690 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690 gets a score of 163.9 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4690 is 1 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f10
Core
Haswell
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2014
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
45.95k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.95k points
157.54k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4690
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
13.75k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
13.02k
22.58k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
4.99k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.74k
3.55k (x0.75)
TOTAL
45.95k
44.87k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-4690

2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
85.98k
50.99k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
49.01k
84.4k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.5k
18.95k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.46k
3.2k (x0.34)
TOTAL
163.95k
157.54k (x0.96)

Performance/W
i5-4690
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1024 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
583 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
1952 points/W
2424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4690
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5889 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3339 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1216 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
11781 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4