| | | | | | |

Core i5-4690 vs Mobile 3020e


Description
The i5-4690 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690 gets a score of 163.9 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4690 is 3.1 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
820f01
Core
Haswell
Dali
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
84 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2014
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.95k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.95k points
52.42k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4690
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
9.28k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
13.02k
14.56k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
3.44k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.74k
2.06k (x0.43)
TOTAL
45.95k
29.34k (x0.64)

Multithread

i5-4690

3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
85.98k
15.75k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
49.01k
28.63k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.5k
5.87k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.46k
2.17k (x0.23)
TOTAL
163.95k
52.42k (x0.32)

Performance/W
i5-4690
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
1024 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
583 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
1952 points/W
8737 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4690
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
5889 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3339 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1216 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
11781 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4