Core i5-4670K vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The i5-4670K is based on Haswell architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4670K gets a score of 140.2 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the i5-4670K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4670K gets a score of 140.2 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the i5-4670K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
50657
Core
Haswell
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
84 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2013
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
42.25k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.18k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4670K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
21.79k
12.92k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
11.49k
10.97k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
2.54k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
5.09k (x1.2)
TOTAL
42.25k
31.52k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-4670K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
75.9k
103.33k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
40.88k
87.67k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.08k
20.1k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
4.91k (x0.78)
TOTAL
140.18k
216.02k (x1.54)
Performance/W
i5-4670K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
904 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
487 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
203 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
1669 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4670K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5735 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3023 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
11120 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4