| | | | | | |

Core i5-4670K vs i5-10400F


Description
The i5-4670K is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4670K gets a score of 140.2 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.8 times faster than the i5-4670K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0655
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16386 kB
Date
June 2013
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
42.25k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.18k points
390.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4670K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.79k
28.39k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
11.49k
24.89k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
5.78k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
13.19k (x3.11)
TOTAL
42.25k
72.25k (x1.71)

Multithread

i5-4670K

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
75.9k
180.2k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
40.88k
163.51k (x4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.08k
40.6k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
6.48k (x1.03)
TOTAL
140.18k
390.78k (x2.79)

Performance/W
i5-4670K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
904 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
487 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
203 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
1669 points/W
6012 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4670K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5735 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3023 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
11120 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4