| | | | | | |

Core i5-4670K vs Ryzen 3 3350U


Description
The i5-4670K is based on Haswell architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4670K gets a score of 140.2 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3350U is 1 times faster than the i5-4670K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
84 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
42.25k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.18k points
144.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4670K
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.79k
13.25k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
11.49k
21.67k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
4.79k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
3.98k (x0.94)
TOTAL
42.25k
43.7k (x1.03)

Multithread

i5-4670K

3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
75.9k
46.47k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
40.88k
78.38k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.08k
16.69k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
3.3k (x0.52)
TOTAL
140.18k
144.84k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i5-4670K
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
904 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
487 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
203 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
1669 points/W
9656 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4670K
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5735 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3023 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
11120 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4