| | | | | | |

Core i5-4670K vs Ryzen 3 3250U


Description
The i5-4670K is based on Haswell architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4670K gets a score of 140.2 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4670K is 1.8 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Dali
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
84 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
42.25k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.18k points
77.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4670K
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.79k
9.33k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
11.49k
17.1k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
3.57k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
3.26k (x0.77)
TOTAL
42.25k
33.26k (x0.79)

Multithread

i5-4670K

3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
75.9k
22.14k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
40.88k
40.04k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.08k
10.71k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
5k (x0.79)
TOTAL
140.18k
77.88k (x0.56)

Performance/W
i5-4670K
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
904 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
487 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
203 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
1669 points/W
5192 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4670K
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
5735 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3023 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
11120 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4