Core i5-4590S vs Xeon E5-2680 v2
Description
The i5-4590S is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590S gets a score of 117.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 4.7 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590S gets a score of 117.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 4.7 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
306e4
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
10 /20
TDP
65 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
25600 kB
Date
May 2014
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
34.75k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.77k points
551.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4590S
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.19k
10.55k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
10.02k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
3.99k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.27k
3.66k (x0.86)
TOTAL
34.75k
28.23k (x0.81)
Multithread
i5-4590S
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
47.15k
215.04k (x4.56)
Test#2 (FP)
44.1k
230.43k (x5.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.93k
96.87k (x5.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
8.76k (x1.02)
TOTAL
117.77k
551.1k (x4.68)
Performance/W
i5-4590S
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
725 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
678 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
276 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
132 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
4792 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4590S
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3326 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1345 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1155 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
9391 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4