Core i5-4590S vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The i5-4590S is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590S gets a score of 117.8 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590S gets a score of 117.8 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
206d7
Core
Haswell
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
15360 kB
Date
May 2014
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
34.75k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.77k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4590S
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
13.19k
6.95k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
6.24k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
3.05k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.27k
2.56k (x0.6)
TOTAL
34.75k
18.8k (x0.54)
Multithread
i5-4590S
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
47.15k
90.01k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
44.1k
82.43k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.93k
42.59k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
9.66k (x1.12)
TOTAL
117.77k
224.7k (x1.91)
Performance/W
i5-4590S
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
725 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
678 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
276 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
132 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4590S
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3326 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1345 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1155 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
9391 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4