| | | | | | |

Core i5-4590S vs i5-10300H


Description
The i5-4590S is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590S gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4590S is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0652
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.75k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.77k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4590S
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.19k
15.65k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
23.13k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.66k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.27k
11.43k (x2.67)
TOTAL
34.75k
55.87k (x1.61)

Multithread

i5-4590S

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.15k
26.77k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
44.1k
43.81k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.93k
10.17k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
11.91k (x1.38)
TOTAL
117.77k
92.66k (x0.79)

Performance/W
i5-4590S
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
725 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
678 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
276 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
132 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
2059 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4590S
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3326 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1345 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1155 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
9391 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4