| | | | | | |

Core i5-4590S vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i5-4590S is based on Haswell architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590S gets a score of 117.8 k points while the 2700X gets 412.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.5 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f82
Core
Haswell
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2014
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
34.75k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.77k points
431.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4590S
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.24k
4.25k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
19.72k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.84k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
21.36k (x4.98)
TOTAL
23.84k
51.17k (x2.15)

Multithread

i5-4590S

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.01k
35.04k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
37.75k
181.42k (x4.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
64.86k (x3.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
8.21k (x0.97)
TOTAL
78.37k
289.54k (x3.69)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4590S
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.19k
14.44k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
24.92k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.8k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.27k
19.07k (x4.46)
TOTAL
34.75k
64.24k (x1.85)

Multithread

i5-4590S

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.15k
122.01k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
44.1k
220.34k (x5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.93k
59.89k (x3.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
9.9k (x1.15)
TOTAL
117.77k
412.13k (x3.5)

Performance/W
i5-4590S
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
725 points/W
1162 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
678 points/W
2099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
276 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
132 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
3925 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4590S
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3326 points/GHz
5796 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1345 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1155 points/GHz
4435 points/GHz
TOTAL
9391 points/GHz
14939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4