| | | | | | |

Core i5-4590 vs i7-8650U


Description
The i5-4590 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590 gets a score of 140 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8650U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ea
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
84 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2014
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
40.93k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.99k points
173.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4590
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
21.61k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.12k
19.69k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.61k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.19k
9.95k (x2.38)
TOTAL
40.93k
55.86k (x1.36)

Multithread

i5-4590

i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
75.76k
78.38k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
40.42k
72.02k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.97k
16.95k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.84k
6.15k (x0.9)
TOTAL
139.99k
173.49k (x1.24)

Performance/W
i5-4590
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
902 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
481 points/W
4802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
1130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
410 points/W
TOTAL
1667 points/W
11566 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4590
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
5643 points/GHz
5146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3006 points/GHz
4689 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1097 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1132 points/GHz
2368 points/GHz
TOTAL
11063 points/GHz
13300 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4