| | | | | | |

Core i5-4590 vs i7-10510U


Description
The i5-4590 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590 gets a score of 140 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ec
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
84 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2014
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.93k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.99k points
190.82k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4590
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
22.85k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
11.12k
21.15k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.78k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.19k
10.24k (x2.44)
TOTAL
40.93k
59.01k (x1.44)

Multithread

i5-4590

i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
75.76k
86.08k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
40.42k
79.78k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.97k
18.26k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.84k
6.69k (x0.98)
TOTAL
139.99k
190.82k (x1.36)

Performance/W
i5-4590
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
902 points/W
5739 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
481 points/W
5319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
1667 points/W
12721 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4590
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
5643 points/GHz
4664 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3006 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1132 points/GHz
2089 points/GHz
TOTAL
11063 points/GHz
12044 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4