| | | | | | |

Core i5-4570 vs i5-10400T


Description
The i5-4570 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4570 gets a score of 161.6 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.9 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
84 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
43.56k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.61k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4570
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
4k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
10.33k
14.19k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.74k
4.62k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.33k
11.03k (x2.54)
TOTAL
23.56k
33.84k (x1.44)

Multithread

i5-4570

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.5k
22.77k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
41.12k
96.59k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.71k
31.65k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
2.45k (x0.33)
TOTAL
83.76k
153.46k (x1.83)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4570
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.82k
12.61k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
11.4k
17.94k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.03k
4.83k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.27k
10.81k (x2.53)
TOTAL
33.53k
46.19k (x1.38)

Multithread

i5-4570

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
50.8k
74.62k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
45.22k
119.63k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
32.65k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
2.52k (x0.52)
TOTAL
120.71k
229.42k (x1.9)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4570
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.13k
12.5k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
12.02k
19.05k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
4.72k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
10.3k (x2.21)
TOTAL
34.8k
46.57k (x1.34)

Multithread

i5-4570

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
49.75k
74.58k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
45.72k
126.96k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.93k
31.76k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
2.5k (x0.28)
TOTAL
124.44k
235.8k (x1.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4570
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.72k
22k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
12.27k
19.98k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.03k
4.57k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
11.31k (x2.49)
TOTAL
43.56k
57.85k (x1.33)

Multithread

i5-4570

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
85.75k
136.69k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
48.71k
135.25k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.08k
32.76k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.07k
2.48k (x0.35)
TOTAL
161.61k
307.18k (x1.9)

Performance/W
i5-4570
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1021 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
580 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
239 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
1924 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4570
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6034 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3408 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1398 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1261 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
12101 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4