Core i5-4570 vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i5-4570 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4570 gets a score of 161.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4570 gets a score of 161.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
43.56k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.61k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4570
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.72k
14.58k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
12.27k
23.98k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.03k
5.35k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
6.34k (x1.4)
TOTAL
43.56k
50.25k (x1.15)
Multithread
i5-4570
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
85.75k
57.37k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
48.71k
107.03k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.08k
28.9k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.07k
7.05k (x1)
TOTAL
161.61k
200.34k (x1.24)
Performance/W
i5-4570
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1021 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
580 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
239 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
1924 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4570
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6034 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3408 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1398 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1261 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
12101 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4