| | | | | | |

Core i5-4570 vs Ryzen 3 2200G


Description
The i5-4570 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4570 gets a score of 161.6 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4570 is 1 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f10
Core
Haswell
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
43.56k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.61k points
157.54k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4570
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.72k
13.75k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
12.27k
22.58k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.03k
4.99k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
3.55k (x0.78)
TOTAL
43.56k
44.87k (x1.03)

Multithread

i5-4570

2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
85.75k
50.99k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
48.71k
84.4k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.08k
18.95k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.07k
3.2k (x0.45)
TOTAL
161.61k
157.54k (x0.97)

Performance/W
i5-4570
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1021 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
580 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
239 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
1924 points/W
2424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4570
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6034 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3408 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1398 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1261 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
12101 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4