Core i5-4570 vs FX 8320
Description
The i5-4570 is based on Haswell architecture while the 8320 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4570 gets a score of 124.4 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4570 is 1.2 times faster than the 8320. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4570 gets a score of 124.4 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4570 is 1.2 times faster than the 8320. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
600f20
Core
Haswell
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
84 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2013
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
43.56k points
16.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.61k points
103.21k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4570
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
13.13k
5.35k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
12.02k
5.14k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
2.15k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
4.04k (x0.87)
TOTAL
34.8k
16.68k (x0.48)
Multithread
i5-4570
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
49.75k
36.79k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
45.72k
40.2k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.93k
19.57k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
6.66k (x0.74)
TOTAL
124.44k
103.21k (x0.83)
Performance/W
i5-4570
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
592 points/W
294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
544 points/W
322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
1481 points/W
826 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4570
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
3648 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3340 points/GHz
1285 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1388 points/GHz
537 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1292 points/GHz
1010 points/GHz
TOTAL
9668 points/GHz
4171 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4