Core i5-4460 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The i5-4460 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
50657
Core
Haswell
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
84 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
May 2014
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
39.53k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.27k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4460
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
19.84k
12.92k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
10.86k
10.97k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
2.54k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
5.09k (x1.16)
TOTAL
39.53k
31.52k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-4460
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
75.08k
103.33k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
42.36k
87.67k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
20.1k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.45k
4.91k (x0.76)
TOTAL
140.27k
216.02k (x1.54)
Performance/W
i5-4460
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
894 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
504 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
195 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
1670 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4460
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5834 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3193 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1290 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
11628 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4