| | | | | | |

Core i5-4460 vs i5-10400T


Description
The i5-4460 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.2 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
84 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
39.53k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.27k points
307.18k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4460
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.12k
12.5k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
10.69k
19.05k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
4.72k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
10.3k (x2.66)
TOTAL
31.39k
46.57k (x1.48)

Multithread

i5-4460

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
45.75k
74.58k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
42.71k
126.96k (x2.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.81k
31.76k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
2.5k (x0.41)
TOTAL
112.35k
235.8k (x2.1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4460
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.84k
22k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
10.86k
19.98k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
4.57k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
11.31k (x2.58)
TOTAL
39.53k
57.85k (x1.46)

Multithread

i5-4460

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
75.08k
136.69k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
42.36k
135.25k (x3.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
32.76k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.45k
2.48k (x0.38)
TOTAL
140.27k
307.18k (x2.19)

Performance/W
i5-4460
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
894 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
504 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
195 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
1670 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4460
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5834 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3193 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1290 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
11628 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4