Core i5-4460 vs i5-10400F
Description
The i5-4460 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.8 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.8 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0655
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16386 kB
Date
May 2014
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
39.53k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.27k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4460
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
19.84k
28.39k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
10.86k
24.89k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
5.78k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
13.19k (x3.01)
TOTAL
39.53k
72.25k (x1.83)
Multithread
i5-4460
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
75.08k
180.2k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
42.36k
163.51k (x3.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
40.6k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.45k
6.48k (x1.01)
TOTAL
140.27k
390.78k (x2.79)
Performance/W
i5-4460
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
894 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
504 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
195 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
1670 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4460
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5834 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3193 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1290 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
11628 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4