| | | | | | |

Core i5-4460 vs Ryzen 3 3200U


Description
The i5-4460 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4460 is 2.3 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
84 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
39.53k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.27k points
61.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4460
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.84k
11.13k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
10.86k
19.38k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
4.47k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
3.87k (x0.88)
TOTAL
39.53k
38.85k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-4460

3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
75.08k
17.13k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
42.36k
30.56k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
9.44k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.45k
4.09k (x0.63)
TOTAL
140.27k
61.23k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i5-4460
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
894 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
504 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
195 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
1670 points/W
4082 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4460
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5834 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3193 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1290 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
11628 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4