| | | | | | |

Core i5-4460 vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The i5-4460 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2014
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
39.53k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.27k points
168.69k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4460
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.12k
13.05k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
10.69k
22.88k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
5.39k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
7.31k (x1.89)
TOTAL
31.39k
48.63k (x1.55)

Multithread

i5-4460

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
45.75k
51.73k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
42.71k
87.74k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.81k
20.74k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.57k (x1.08)
TOTAL
112.35k
166.79k (x1.48)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4460
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
19.84k
14.48k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
10.86k
23.84k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
5.43k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
5.46k (x1.24)
TOTAL
39.53k
49.21k (x1.24)

Multithread

i5-4460

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
75.08k
54.39k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
42.36k
88.77k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
20.04k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.45k
5.48k (x0.85)
TOTAL
140.27k
168.69k (x1.2)

Performance/W
i5-4460
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
894 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
504 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
195 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
1670 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4460
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5834 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3193 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1290 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
11628 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4