Core i5-4460 vs FX 8350
Description
The i5-4460 is based on Haswell architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 112.4 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 112.4 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
600f20
Core
Haswell
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
84 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2014
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
39.53k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.27k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4460
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
12.12k
9.85k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
10.69k
8.41k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
3.58k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
6.32k (x1.63)
TOTAL
31.39k
28.16k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-4460
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
45.75k
44.93k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
42.71k
45.21k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.81k
22.81k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
5.19k (x0.85)
TOTAL
112.35k
118.14k (x1.05)
Performance/W
i5-4460
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
545 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
508 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
1338 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4460
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3565 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3143 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1385 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1139 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
9232 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4