| | | | | | |

Core i5-4460 vs A10 9630P


Description
The i5-4460 is based on Haswell architecture while the 9630P is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4460 is 4.3 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
660f51
Core
Haswell
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
84 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2014
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
39.53k points
23.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.27k points
32.92k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4460
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
19.84k
8.52k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
10.86k
11.04k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
2.36k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
1.79k (x0.41)
TOTAL
39.53k
23.7k (x0.6)

Multithread

i5-4460

9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
75.08k
12.83k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
42.36k
14.44k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
3.6k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.45k
2.05k (x0.32)
TOTAL
140.27k
32.92k (x0.23)

Performance/W
i5-4460
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
894 points/W
285 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
504 points/W
321 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
195 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
1670 points/W
732 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4460
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
5834 points/GHz
2582 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3193 points/GHz
3344 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1290 points/GHz
543 points/GHz
TOTAL
11628 points/GHz
7183 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4