| | | | | | |

Core i5-4440 vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The i5-4440 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4440 gets a score of 138.7 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
84 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
138.69k points
175.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4440
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.71k
3.78k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
9.23k
16.42k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.28k
4.75k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
5.51k (x1.45)
TOTAL
21.02k
30.46k (x1.45)

Multithread

i5-4440

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.33k
15.18k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
34.2k
74.87k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.91k
27.85k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.56k
6.08k (x0.93)
TOTAL
70k
123.97k (x1.77)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4440
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.08k
13.72k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
22.93k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.99k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
5.27k (x1.25)
TOTAL
38.29k
46.91k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-4440

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
73.26k
50.54k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
41.01k
93.33k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
25.25k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
6.07k (x0.83)
TOTAL
138.69k
175.18k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i5-4440
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
872 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
488 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
204 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
1651 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4440
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3174 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1275 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
11604 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4