| | | | | | |

Core i5-4440 vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i5-4440 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4440 gets a score of 138.7 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f10
Core
Haswell
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
138.69k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4440
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.71k
3.8k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
9.23k
17.38k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.28k
5.17k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
3.16k (x0.83)
TOTAL
21.02k
29.52k (x1.4)

Multithread

i5-4440

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.33k
15.28k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
34.2k
76.44k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.91k
27.48k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.56k
3.02k (x0.46)
TOTAL
70k
122.2k (x1.75)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4440
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.43k
13.95k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
10.13k
20.7k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
5.33k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
3.03k (x0.77)
TOTAL
30.01k
43.01k (x1.43)

Multithread

i5-4440

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
43.67k
58.56k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
38.78k
92.95k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
28.55k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
2.98k (x0.39)
TOTAL
107.2k
183.04k (x1.71)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4440
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.56k
13.04k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
10.36k
22.35k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.45k
5.37k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
3.4k (x0.89)
TOTAL
30.17k
44.15k (x1.46)

Multithread

i5-4440

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
44.07k
56.49k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
41.07k
100.74k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.89k
28.21k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.33k
3.04k (x0.42)
TOTAL
109.35k
188.49k (x1.72)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4440
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
19.08k
14.2k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
23.23k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
5.35k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
5.18k (x1.23)
TOTAL
38.29k
47.96k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-4440

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
73.26k
58.24k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
41.01k
105.72k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
28.73k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
5.59k (x0.77)
TOTAL
138.69k
198.27k (x1.43)

Performance/W
i5-4440
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
872 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
488 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
204 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
1651 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4440
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3174 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1275 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
11604 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4