| | | | | | |

Core i5-4440 vs Ryzen 3 3350U


Description
The i5-4440 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4440 gets a score of 138.7 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3350U is 1 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
84 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
138.69k points
144.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4440
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.08k
13.25k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
21.67k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.79k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
3.98k (x0.95)
TOTAL
38.29k
43.7k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-4440

3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.26k
46.47k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
41.01k
78.38k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
16.69k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
3.3k (x0.45)
TOTAL
138.69k
144.84k (x1.04)

Performance/W
i5-4440
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
872 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
488 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
204 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
1651 points/W
9656 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4440
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3174 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1275 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
11604 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4