| | | | | | |

Core i5-4300U vs i7-9850H


Description
The i5-4300U is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4300U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 4.5 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
906ed
Core
Haswell
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2013
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.18k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.79k points
289.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4300U
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.54k
19.83k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
8.71k
16.52k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.69k
3.87k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
9.02k (x2.79)
TOTAL
32.18k
49.24k (x1.53)

Multithread

i5-4300U

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.64k
130.19k (x4.11)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
121.44k (x5.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.46k
28.05k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
9.62k (x3.11)
TOTAL
64.79k
289.3k (x4.47)

Performance/W
i5-4300U
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
2110 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1439 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
564 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
4319 points/W
6429 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4300U
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
5705 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3003 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1116 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
11097 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4