| | | | | | |

Core i5-4300U vs i7-7560U


Description
The i5-4300U is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4300U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7560U is 1.5 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
32.18k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.79k points
97.27k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4300U
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.54k
19.37k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
8.71k
17.26k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.69k
3.78k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
7.75k (x2.4)
TOTAL
32.18k
48.16k (x1.5)

Multithread

i5-4300U

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.64k
39.17k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
38.24k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.46k
8.9k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
10.97k (x3.55)
TOTAL
64.79k
97.27k (x1.5)

Performance/W
i5-4300U
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
2110 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1439 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
564 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
4319 points/W
6485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4300U
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
5705 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3003 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1116 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
11097 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4