Core i5-4300U vs Ryzen 5 3600X
Description
The i5-4300U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3600X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4300U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 5.8 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4300U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 5.8 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
870f10
Core
Haswell
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
January 2013
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.18k points
69.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.79k points
376.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4300U
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.54k
16.21k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
8.71k
22.99k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.69k
8.76k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
21.94k (x6.78)
TOTAL
32.18k
69.9k (x2.17)
Multithread
i5-4300U
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
31.64k
121.94k (x3.85)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
153.22k (x7.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.46k
67.74k (x8.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
33.31k (x10.78)
TOTAL
64.79k
376.22k (x5.81)
Performance/W
i5-4300U
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2110 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1439 points/W
1613 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
564 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
351 points/W
TOTAL
4319 points/W
3960 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4300U
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5705 points/GHz
3685 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3003 points/GHz
5225 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1116 points/GHz
4986 points/GHz
TOTAL
11097 points/GHz
15887 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4