Core i5-4300U vs i5-11300H
Description
The i5-4300U is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4300U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 4.4 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4300U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 4.4 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
806c1
Core
Haswell
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
32.18k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.79k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4300U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.54k
25.83k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
8.71k
23.56k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.69k
9.2k (x2.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
5.06k (x1.56)
TOTAL
32.18k
63.64k (x1.98)
Multithread
i5-4300U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.64k
116.87k (x3.69)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
121.08k (x5.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.46k
41.8k (x4.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
6k (x1.94)
TOTAL
64.79k
285.75k (x4.41)
Performance/W
i5-4300U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2110 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1439 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
564 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
4319 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4300U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5705 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3003 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1116 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
11097 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4