| | | | | | |

Core i5-4210U vs Pentium E6600


Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the E6600 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4210U is 1.5 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
1067a
Core
Haswell
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
April 2014
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
16.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
29.4k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
3.57k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
7.85k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
3.14k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
1.58k (x0.54)
TOTAL
23.95k
16.14k (x0.67)

Multithread

i5-4210U

E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
6.99k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
14.66k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
6.09k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
1.66k (x0.67)
TOTAL
45.22k
29.4k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i5-4210U
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1169 points/W
108 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1171 points/W
226 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
510 points/W
94 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
26 points/W
TOTAL
3015 points/W
452 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3038 points/GHz
2561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1322 points/GHz
1023 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1083 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
TOTAL
8872 points/GHz
5263 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4