| | | | | | |

Core i5-4210U vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
50657
Core
Haswell
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2014
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
311.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4210U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2.95k
2.59k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
7.38k
9.5k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
3.15k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
5.9k (x2.03)
TOTAL
16.35k
21.13k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-4210U

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4.86k
21.09k (x4.34)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
80.93k (x4.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.09k
30.76k (x4.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
8.51k (x3.4)
TOTAL
31.86k
141.3k (x4.43)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
16.86k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
12.08k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
3.37k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
6.29k (x2.31)
TOTAL
27.41k
38.61k (x1.41)

Multithread

i5-4210U

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
150.99k (x5.25)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
118.54k (x6.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
33.44k (x4.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
8.6k (x3.3)
TOTAL
57.58k
311.57k (x5.41)

Performance/W
i5-4210U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4