Core i5-4210U vs Xeon X5675
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
206c2
Core
Haswell
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2014
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
8.77k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
5.82k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
3.47k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
2.98k (x1.02)
TOTAL
23.95k
21.04k (x0.88)
Multithread
i5-4210U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
53.23k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
39.35k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
27.05k (x3.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
5.28k (x2.12)
TOTAL
45.22k
124.92k (x2.76)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1169 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1171 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
510 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
3015 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3038 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1322 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1083 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
8872 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4