| | | | | | |

Core i5-4210U vs Xeon E5472


Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5472 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
10676
Core
Haswell
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
April 2014
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
48.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4210U
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.95k
2.29k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
7.38k
5.85k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
2.44k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
4.81k (x1.65)
TOTAL
16.35k
15.39k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-4210U

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4.86k
9.06k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
23.09k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.09k
9.7k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
2.53k (x1.01)
TOTAL
31.86k
44.38k (x1.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
2.88k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
6.36k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
2.55k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
4.83k (x1.65)
TOTAL
23.95k
16.62k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-4210U

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
11.19k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
24.85k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
10.04k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
2.54k (x1.02)
TOTAL
45.22k
48.62k (x1.08)

Performance/W
i5-4210U
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1169 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1171 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
510 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
3015 points/W
608 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3038 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1322 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1083 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
8872 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4