Core i5-4210U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.1 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.1 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2014
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4210U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.95k
2.6k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
7.38k
7.55k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
2.61k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
2.03k (x0.7)
TOTAL
16.35k
14.79k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-4210U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.86k
17.41k (x3.58)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
75.46k (x4.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.09k
26.25k (x3.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
4.65k (x1.86)
TOTAL
31.86k
123.78k (x3.88)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
8.22k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
12.06k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
4.01k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
2.89k (x0.99)
TOTAL
23.95k
27.18k (x1.13)
Multithread
i5-4210U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
61.34k (x3.5)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
90.21k (x5.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
26.2k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
4.62k (x1.86)
TOTAL
45.22k
182.37k (x4.03)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4210U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.05k
6.04k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
5.31k
10.18k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.74k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.41k
2.41k (x1.71)
TOTAL
13.87k
21.37k (x1.54)
Multithread
i5-4210U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.01k
47.51k (x5.28)
Test#2 (FP)
16.3k
75.12k (x4.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
19.72k (x4.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
5.45k (x2.53)
TOTAL
32.1k
147.8k (x4.6)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
12.16k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
11.82k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
3.02k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.4k (x0.88)
TOTAL
27.41k
29.39k (x1.07)
Multithread
i5-4210U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
103.77k (x3.61)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
102.28k (x5.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
26.13k (x3.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
5.65k (x2.17)
TOTAL
57.58k
237.83k (x4.13)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4